Okay, so I need to improve the original title “Chinese EVs inch closer to the US as Canada slashes tariffs” to make it more engaging, SEO-optimized, and concise, with a max of 6 words. First, I’ll break down the original title to understand its core message. The main points are: Chinese EVs (electric vehicles), getting closer to the US, and Canada reducing tariffs. The key elements here are the subject (Chinese EVs), the action (moving closer to the US), and the cause (Canada’s tariff cuts). To make it more engaging and catchy, I should focus on the action and the opportunity. Maybe use stronger verbs than “inch closer.” Words like “enter,” “expand,” or “invade” might work. Also, “slashes tariffs” can be rephrased to something like “tariff cuts” or “reduced tariffs.” SEO optimization means including relevant keywords. “Chinese EVs,” “US market,” “Canada tariffs” are probably important. I need to make sure the title includes these or similar keywords. Conciseness is key here—only 6 words. The original is 11 words, so I need to cut it down significantly. Let me try some combinations: 1. “Chinese EVs Enter US via Canada” – 6 words, includes key elements, but “via Canada” might not capture the tariff aspect clearly. 2. “Canada Tariff Cuts Boost Chinese EVs” – Focuses on Canada’s action and the impact on EVs, but doesn’t mention the US market. 3. “Chinese EVs Target US Market Now” – More action-oriented, but misses the Canada tariff part. 4. “Chinese EVs Gain US Tariff Advantage” – Implies tariff changes benefiting EVs, but Canada’s role is unclear. 5. “Canada Fuels Chinese EV US Expansion” – Uses “fuels” metaphorically, includes all elements, but is it clear enough? Hmm, maybe I can merge the ideas better. The original title’s main point is that due to Canada’s tariff cuts, Chinese EVs are moving closer to the US. So the cause-effect is Canada’s action enabling Chinese EVs to enter the US market. Another attempt: “Chinese EVs Near US Following Tariffs” – “Following tariffs” is a bit vague. Maybe specify Canada. “Chinese EVs Hit US via Canada” – “Hit” is more impactful, but does it imply success or just entry? “Chinese EVs Enter US Post-Canada Tariffs” – Too long; “post-Canada tariffs” is a bit awkward. What if I use “as” to show causation more succinctly? “Chinese EVs Enter US as Canada Acts” – but “acts” is vague. Wait, maybe “Chinese EVs Advance on US Market” – captures movement but misses Canada’s role. Alternatively, focus on the opportunity: “Chinese EVs Seize US Tariff Break” – but unclear on Canada. Perhaps “Tariff Cuts Propel Chinese EVs USward” – “USward” is unconventional but concise. Might not be best. Back to earlier idea: “Chinese EVs Enter US via Canada” – it’s concise, includes key players and action. Maybe that’s the best balance. Alternatively, “Chinese EVs Expand to US Market” – more general but misses Canada. “Canadian Tariffs Cut, Chinese EVs Advance” – but two separate clauses, less smooth. Finalizing, “Chinese EVs Enter US via Canada” seems to hit the key points within 6 words. It’s engaging, mentions both countries, and implies the movement due to Canada’s actions. “Chinese EVs Enter US via Canada”

Mr Tactition

• February 10, 2026
• 1 min read