Plato’s Symposium: Love Advice That Still Rewires Your Brain
Why do we still crave a 2,400-year-old Athenian party’s wisdom?
To dismiss Plato’s Symposion as ancient gossip is to ignore a manual for the modern heart. The text exists at the intersection of philosophy, psychology, and personal growth—a blueprint for how we understand connection today.
The Symposion unfolds as a drinking party (the literal meaning of “symposion”) where seven men debate Eros. Plato famously frames this through a narrative within a narrative, using Diotima, a female seer, as Socrates’ teacher. This structural brilliance serves a deeper purpose: it dismantles ego to reveal truth.
The text’s impact is historical and deeply personal. It cemented the Western concept of a transcendent God—a being of perfect, distant goodness we strive toward, a direct ancestor of Christian theology. It also introduces the core philosophical tension in relationships: appraisal versus bestowal.
Appraisal is transactional: I love you because you are beautiful, witty, or brave. Bestowal is unconditional: a mother loves her child regardless of merit; charity gives without demanding worthiness in return. Which is “truer”? Plato forces us to ask if love is a reaction to traits or a state of being we project.
Reading the Symposium requires filtering the “filler”—the myths and cultural references of Plato’s time—to find the compressed wisdom beneath. When we do, we recognize that “Platonic love” has evolved, but the ladder of ascent remains: moving from the physical to the ideal.
Whether it is the lawyer’s argument or the doctor’s science, the night builds toward Socrates’ revelation. The lesson is that the “game” of love is a philosophical practice, not just an emotion. By understanding the ancient architecture of desire, we gain something modern neurochemistry books still struggle to explain: a map to a more meaningful connection.
No Comments